several questions about your commits from branches/attachments.

[Vlad Skvortsov]

Ivan Glushkov wrote:
>>>>> 3. May be we should use some agreement about attachments naming? For
>>>>> example to link to the second attachment of the 5'th issue: "i#5.f2"?
>>>>> Or something similar?
>>>>>
>>>> Yeah, we might... But there is a problem of "unusual" file names here
>>>> (spaces, commas, etc). So it's not that straightforward. I suggest
>>>> getting users' feedback after the 0.6 release to decide how we want to
>>>> handle that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> i meant here to address to them by number, not name. So i#5.f2 - is
>>> the second file attached to issue #5.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, how would it be usable?
>>
> Only in conversations or in issues descriptions.

Then a number doesn't seem to convey too much meaning -- a name would be 
much better for this purpose.

Hmm, how about this kind of syntax:

i#1{filename.txt}

The file name should be URL-encoded if it contains anything except 
[-0-9a-zA-Z].

Opinions?

-- 
Vlad Skvortsov, vss at 73rus.com, http://vss.73rus.com