several questions about your commits from branches/attachments.

[Ivan Glushkov]

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 00:45:33 +0400, Vlad Skvortsov <vss at 73rus.com> wrote:

> Ivan Glushkov wrote:
>>>> 3. May be we should use some agreement about attachments naming? For
>>>> example to link to the second attachment of the 5'th issue: "i#5.f2"?
>>>> Or something similar?
>>>>
>>> Yeah, we might... But there is a problem of "unusual" file names here
>>> (spaces, commas, etc). So it's not that straightforward. I suggest
>>> getting users' feedback after the 0.6 release to decide how we want to
>>> handle that.
>>>
>>
>> i meant here to address to them by number, not name. So i#5.f2 - is
>> the second file attached to issue #5.
>>
>
> Hmm, how would it be usable?
>
Only in conversations or in issues descriptions.