several questions about your commits from branches/attachments.

[Ivan Glushkov]

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:09:16 +0400, Vlad Skvortsov <vss at 73rus.com> wrote:

> Ivan Glushkov wrote:
>>>>>> 3. May be we should use some agreement about attachments naming? For
>>>>>> example to link to the second attachment of the 5'th issue:  
>>>>>> "i#5.f2"?
>>>>>> Or something similar?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, we might... But there is a problem of "unusual" file names here
>>>>> (spaces, commas, etc). So it's not that straightforward. I suggest
>>>>> getting users' feedback after the 0.6 release to decide how we want  
>>>>> to
>>>>> handle that.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i meant here to address to them by number, not name. So i#5.f2 - is
>>>> the second file attached to issue #5.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm, how would it be usable?
>>>
>> Only in conversations or in issues descriptions.
>
> Then a number doesn't seem to convey too much meaning -- a name would be  
> much better for this purpose.
>
> Hmm, how about this kind of syntax:
>
> i#1{filename.txt}
>
> The file name should be URL-encoded if it contains anything except  
> [-0-9a-zA-Z].
>
> Opinions?
>
good.
you meant [._-0-9a-zA-Z]?