"local_mode" and "no_commits" options for "new" command

[Vlad Skvortsov]

Иван Глушков wrote:

[skipped]

>>
>> We are actually dealing with two separate issues here.
>>
>> The first is to restrict DITrack to local operations ('local' in a sense
>> 'not requiring network access'). As of now, we only need a network
>> access when committing.
>>
>> The second one is to list issues based on their status (local/firm) in
>> one single command ('ls').
>>
>> To me, these two are completely different, that's why I suggest
>> decoupling them. Furthermore, I tend to think that '-l' option for 'ls'
>> should be reconsidered in a  more general context (and removed for now
>> to avoid polluting 0.5 with not-thought-through features).
>
> I still suppose that "list -l" is not the same as "status", but indeed
> it should be reconsidered.
>
> Conclusions:
> 1. We need option for all commands to work in local mode (without
> commits). At present it's "-n" = "--no_commits".
> 2. Two commands do the same job: list local changes to the issue
> database. They are "status" and "list -l". So "-l" should be removed.
>
> Something else?

Nope, this is exactly as I see the problem. I'll update relevant issue 
records.

-- 
Vlad Skvortsov, vss at 73rus.com, http://vss.73rus.com