[ditrack commit] r1379 - in src/trunk/tests/db: categories.tc comment.tc filters.tc issue/delta.tc users.tc
Vlad Skvortsov
vss at 73rus.com
Mon Mar 5 13:01:51 PST 2007
I think these new modules should all go under the DB package, since they
are directly related to the database implementation. E.g,
DITrack.DB.Issue
DITrack.DB.Configuration
etc.
oleg at ditrack.org wrote:
> Author: oleg
> Date: 2007-03-03 05:35:18 -0800 (Sat, 03 Mar 2007)
> New Revision: 1379
>
> Modified:
> src/trunk/tests/db/categories.tc/test.py
> src/trunk/tests/db/comment.tc/test.py
> src/trunk/tests/db/filters.tc/test.py
> src/trunk/tests/db/issue/delta.tc/test.py
> src/trunk/tests/db/users.tc/test.py
> Log:
> changed using module names after r1378
>
>
> Modified: src/trunk/tests/db/categories.tc/test.py
> ===================================================================
> --- src/trunk/tests/db/categories.tc/test.py 2007-03-03 13:32:38 UTC (rev 1378)
> +++ src/trunk/tests/db/categories.tc/test.py 2007-03-03 13:35:18 UTC (rev 1379)
> @@ -29,14 +29,15 @@
> #
>
> import DITrack.DB
> +import DITrack.Configuration
>
> -users = DITrack.DB.UserCfg("users")
> -versions = DITrack.DB.VersionCfg("versions")
> +users = DITrack.Configuration.UserCfg("users")
> +versions = DITrack.Configuration.VersionCfg("versions")
>
> #
> # Correct data
> #
> -categories = DITrack.DB.CategoryCfg("normal.categories", users, versions)
> +categories = DITrack.Configuration.CategoryCfg("normal.categories", users, versions)
>
> assert(len(categories) == 2)
>
> @@ -50,7 +51,7 @@
> #
> # Empty file
> #
> -categories = DITrack.DB.CategoryCfg("empty.categories", users, versions)
> +categories = DITrack.Configuration.CategoryCfg("empty.categories", users, versions)
> assert(len(categories) == 0)
>
> #
> @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@
> #
> for idx in "123456789":
> try:
> - categories = DITrack.DB.CategoryCfg("junk-" + idx + ".categories",
> + categories = DITrack.Configuration.CategoryCfg("junk-" + idx + ".categories",
> users, versions)
> except DITrack.DB.CorruptedDB_UnparseableCategoriesError:
> pass
>
> Modified: src/trunk/tests/db/comment.tc/test.py
> ===================================================================
> --- src/trunk/tests/db/comment.tc/test.py 2007-03-03 13:32:38 UTC (rev 1378)
> +++ src/trunk/tests/db/comment.tc/test.py 2007-03-03 13:35:18 UTC (rev 1379)
> @@ -31,12 +31,12 @@
> import StringIO
> import unittest
>
> -import DITrack.DB
> +import DITrack.Issue
>
> class TestCommentClass(unittest.TestCase):
>
> def test_write_empty_old(self):
> - comment = DITrack.DB.Comment.create(
> + comment = DITrack.Issue.Comment.create(
> text="text",
> added_on="added on",
> added_by="added by",
>
> Modified: src/trunk/tests/db/filters.tc/test.py
> ===================================================================
> --- src/trunk/tests/db/filters.tc/test.py 2007-03-03 13:32:38 UTC (rev 1378)
> +++ src/trunk/tests/db/filters.tc/test.py 2007-03-03 13:35:18 UTC (rev 1379)
> @@ -29,18 +29,18 @@
> #
>
> import DITrack.DB
> +import DITrack.Configuration
>
> -
> #
> # Correct data
> #
> -filters = DITrack.DB.FilterCfg("normal.filters")
> +filters = DITrack.Configuration.FilterCfg("normal.filters")
> assert(len(filters) == 4)
>
> #
> # Empty file
> #
> -filters = DITrack.DB.FilterCfg("empty.filters")
> +filters = DITrack.Configuration.FilterCfg("empty.filters")
> assert(len(filters) == 0)
>
> #
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
> #
> for idx in "12":
> try:
> - filters = DITrack.DB.FilterCfg("junk-" + idx + ".filters")
> + filters = DITrack.Configuration.FilterCfg("junk-" + idx + ".filters")
> except DITrack.DB.CorruptedDB_UnparseableFiltersError:
> pass
> else:
>
> Modified: src/trunk/tests/db/issue/delta.tc/test.py
> ===================================================================
> --- src/trunk/tests/db/issue/delta.tc/test.py 2007-03-03 13:32:38 UTC (rev 1378)
> +++ src/trunk/tests/db/issue/delta.tc/test.py 2007-03-03 13:35:18 UTC (rev 1379)
> @@ -30,15 +30,15 @@
>
> import unittest
>
> -import DITrack.DB
> +import DITrack.Issue
>
> class TestDelta(unittest.TestCase):
>
> def test_empty_new_in_comment0(self):
> - issue = DITrack.DB.Issue.load("empty-new-in-comment0")
> + issue = DITrack.Issue.Issue.load("empty-new-in-comment0")
>
> def test_empty_new0_old1(self):
> - issue = DITrack.DB.Issue.load("empty-new0-old1")
> + issue = DITrack.Issue.Issue.load("empty-new0-old1")
>
> if __name__ == "__main__":
> unittest.main()
>
> Modified: src/trunk/tests/db/users.tc/test.py
> ===================================================================
> --- src/trunk/tests/db/users.tc/test.py 2007-03-03 13:32:38 UTC (rev 1378)
> +++ src/trunk/tests/db/users.tc/test.py 2007-03-03 13:35:18 UTC (rev 1379)
> @@ -29,17 +29,18 @@
> #
>
> import DITrack.DB
> +import DITrack.Configuration
>
> #
> # Empty configuration
> #
> -users = DITrack.DB.UserCfg("empty.users")
> +users = DITrack.Configuration.UserCfg("empty.users")
> assert(len(users) == 0)
>
> #
> # Duplicate entries
> #
> try:
> - users = DITrack.DB.UserCfg("duplicate.users")
> + users = DITrack.Configuration.UserCfg("duplicate.users")
> except DITrack.DB.CorruptedDB_DuplicateUserError:
> pass
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commit mailing list
> Commit at lists.ditrack.org
> http://lists.ditrack.org/mailman/listinfo/commit
>
--
Vlad Skvortsov, vss at 73rus.com, http://vss.73rus.com
More information about the Dev
mailing list